Kilian Streitenberger, Jens Nitzsche

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-214

We investigate vortex-induced vibrations (VIV) of a vertically spring-suspended NACA0021 airfoil at very high angles of attack of 60° and 70° at a chord Reynolds number of
2.7 × 105 by comparison of two-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and three-dimensional delayed detached-eddy (DDES) simulations. For the non-moving airfoil,
the simulated flow field is already highly unsteady due to pronounced wake vortex shedding with a dominant Strouhal number of Sr ≈ 0.19 and with large qualitative differences in the spectral content of RANS and DDES integral forces. These differences decrease significantly when the airfoil is conducting sine-like motions either by prescribed forcing or via free fluidstructure interaction. No major differences occur between RANS and DDES in the resulting maximum VIV limit-cycle amplitudes under lock-in conditions, while the lock-in frequency range is slightly narrower for DDES. During lock-in a remarkable reduction in the turbulent intensity can be observed in the scale-resolving simulations.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: 1. IFASD 2024, 1.Events, Steady/Unsteady Aerodynamics
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.