Anna Altkuckatz, Marc Braune, Johannes Dillinger, Martin Müller, Thomas Büte, Charlotte Hanke, Holger Ernst, Heiko Böhlken, Patrick Hartl, Thomas Schmidt, Holger Mai

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-202

Research on Shock Control Bumps (SCBs) for aeroelastic stability at transonic velocities is growing in importance. A wind tunnel flutter test was conducted at the Transonic
Wind Tunnel Göttingen (TWG) using an OAT15A airfoil with a one-meter wingspan and 0.3 m chord. Aeroelastic behavior was tested at Mach numbers from 0.5 to 0.83 and pressures of 30 to 100 kPa. The first test evaluated the “clean profile” and three bump configurations at 50% chord, varying in height. Results showed a reduced transonic dip, and a change in flutter behavior from heave-dominated to pitch-dominated oscillations. A second test aims to resolve the three-dimensional pressure distribution using unsteady pressure-sensitive paint (iPSP) for detailed aerodynamic assessment, including shock dynamics. The paper will elaborate on the test setups and observed aerodynamic and aeroelastic effects on the OAT15A airfoil, discussing the relationship between SCB aerodynamics and resulting aeroelastic behavior.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.