Evangelos Filippou, Jurij Sodja, Roeland De Breuker

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-207

This research investigates the application of aeroelastic tailoring to enhance the post-control surface reversal regime on a mid-range aircraft. Conventionally, active Maneuver
Load Alleviation (MLA) is achieved through control surface actuation, while passive MLA utilizes structural modifications at the material or layout level to exploit wing wash-out deformation. Previous studies have demonstrated the significance of high control effectiveness in active MLA and the limitations of composite tailoring in passive MLA due to roll control authority constraints which typically result in stiffer wings with moderate mass savings. The aeroelastic optimization framework PROTEUS, developed at TU Delft, is employed to enhance operation in the post-control surface reversal regime. This is done to capitalize on increased control authority and thus promote load alleviation. The approach taken in this study is to identify critical constraints and assess the advantages of this strategy while acknowledging the technology’s immaturity, particularly its challenges in maintaining roll control effectiveness in certain flight envelope sectors. The results demonstrate significant mass savings in active MLA within the post-control surface reversal regime compared to conventional active MLA and highlight the substantial impact of the cruise-twist constraint on enhancing this regime.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: 1. IFASD 2024, 1.Events
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.