Lukas Katzenmeier, Cyrille Vidy, Luca Benassi, Christian Breitsamter

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2019-136

At high angles-of-attack, modern high-agility aircraft experience large areas of flow separation and the generation of vortical structures. The interaction of the resulting unsteady flow fields with the tail structure can result in severe vibrations commonly known as tail buffeting. Buffeting phenomena can be predicted using a partitioned coupling between computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and computational structural dynamics (CSD). However, the results strongly depend on the prediction characteristics of the CFD methods regarding the unsteady flow field. As an example, the capabilities of Unsteady ReynoldsAveraged Navier-Stokes (URANS) and Detached-Eddy Simulation (DES) methods for prediction of unsteady flow phenomena differ significantly which has been investigated in the literature. However, little attention has been paid on how these characteristics of the CFD methods affect the actual buffeting loads on a configuration. In the paper the detailed prediction characteristics of different URANS and DES methods are investigated regarding 1) the unsteady flow phenomena involved in tail buffeting and 2) the structural loads on the horizontal tail with a one-way coupling. A configuration with double-delta wing and horizontal tail plane (HTP) is investigated which is sized to highlight buffeting effects in wind-tunnel tests. Simulation conditions are ๐‘€๐‘Žโˆž = 0.2, ๐›ผ = 25ยฐ and ๐‘…๐‘’/1๐‘š = 4.66 ร— 106. The results of the presented research provide a detailed understanding of which CFD methods can be employed for an adequate prediction of tail buffeting in partitioned couplings.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: Dynamic Loads, IFASD 2019
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part ofย  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.ย  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are foundย  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.ย  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.