Vladyslav Rozov, Marco Stuhlpfarrer, Mario Fernandez Osma, Christian Breitsamter

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2019-075

Aeroelastic behavior of aircraft is significantly affected by the presence of engines mounted under the wings. Powered engines influence the unsteady aerodynamics on the one hand and lead to additional unsteady forces due to thrust vector oscillations on the other hand. This work focuses on the incorporation of aerodynamic engine effects into a small disturbance CFD framework to enhance the modeling accuracy of unsteady aerodynamics of aircraft. The effects are numerically modeled by mimicking physically reasonable flow conditions at the intake and nozzle planes of the engine nacelle. Subsequently, the influence of the engine effects on the flutter behavior of an aircraft is studied employing the small-disturbance-CFD-based flutter analysis. The basis for the investigation is the Common Research Model, which represents a modern transonic commercial airliner with a cruise Mach number of 0.85. Two configurations are considered: aircraft with passive engines represented by through-flow nacelles and aircraft with powered engines, where the novel small disturbance engine model is applied. The results are compared in terms of the flutter trends and the predicted flutter boundary. Furthermore, the impact of the modal induced thrust oscillations on the aeroelastic behavior of the aircraft is discussed.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.