Philipp Bekemeyer, Tobias Wunderlich, Stefan Gortz, Sascha Dahne

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2019-105

Aircraft loads analysis is an inherently multidisciplinary process since aerodynamic forces, structural deformations and their correlations need to be accounted for. When increasing the fidelity of underlying mono-disciplinary models, such as using computational fluid dynamics for aerodynamic forces, the coupled fluid-structure analysis becomes an increasingly costly process and ultimately limits the applicability within design and optimization. Reduced order models offer an approach to significantly decrease the computational cost needed while retaining the fidelity of the underlying model. This work proposes a reduced order aerodynamic model which can be coupled with varying structural models rather than developing a reduced order aeroelastic model for a fixed aerodynamic and structural model. This enables generating the model without an actual structural model being present and therefore allows the analysis of different structural models of interest without recomputing the aerodynamic model. First, sampling data is computed using computational fluid dynamics based on a few synthetic mode shapes. Second, a proper orthogonal decomposition-based reduced order model is derived for surface deformations and forces. Finally, a least-squares fit for surface deformations given from the current structural model of interest is performed to find proper orthogonal decomposition coefficients while the overall vertical force is constrained to ensure that trimming conditions are met. Results are presented for the LANN wing at transonic flow conditions and a longrange wing-body configuration. While for the former different synthetic modes are applied and the generality of the method is demonstrated by significantly altering the stiffness of the structural model, for the latter case a structural optimization is performed within each coupling step to highlight the adaptivity of the proposed method. Troughout accurate results are predicted showing only minor deviations for resulting surface force, elastic dispacements and optimized surface thicknesses.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.