Marcus Vinicius P. Viana

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2015-042

In order to reduce costs of operation, new aircraft designs make vast use of light, flexible, and slender structures to achieve higher payloads and improved fuel consumption. At the same time, in order to reduce the amount of flight testing required for the certification of a new aircraft, the use of simulation models for certification purposes increases constantly. These models must be validated based on real flight data, for which airplanes must be instrumented adequately. Nowadays the test setups available for strain sensor calibration are highly sophisticated and instrumented, but also complex, time-demanding and expensive. Therefore, the ability to provide cost effective methodologies will be of great benefit with regards to the often overlooked and ever growing flexible small aircraft market. The current paper focusses on the strain sensor calibration methodology for both strain gauges and Fiber Bragg Grating sensors. The methodology is presented with many details and illustrated using a real application to the DLR Discus-2c sailplane. Various practical pitfalls are discussed as well as the issue of selecting the “best” combination of sensors for the development of the local structural load models.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.