M. Irfan Zafar, Francesca Fusi, Giuseppe Quaranta

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2015-048

This paper focuses on the computational study of nonlinear effects of unsteady aerodynamics for non-classical aileron buzz. It aims at a comprehensive investigation of aileron buzz phenomenon under varying flow parameters utilizing the classical approach of describing function technique with multiple input variables. Limit cycle oscillatory behavior of an asymmetrical airfoil section has been studied initially using an expensive high-fidelity model basd on a coupled CFD/CSD time marching approach. Using this high fidelity model, a multiple input aerodynamic describing function was developed that can effectively represent lumped nonlinearities of aerodynamic subsystem. Limit cycles can be closely identified through multiple input aerodynamic describing function representation, taking into account also the bias effect due to the use of non-symmetric airfoils. Traditional LCO analysis of sensitivity with respect to hinge moment of inertia is performed. Further, outburst points of limit cycle amplitude for varying Mach number and angle of attacks are investigated. By using developed aerodynamic describing function, it has been demonstrated that limit cycle analysis methods may still be used while including the effects of aerodynamic nonlinearities. Results from both methods, direct time marching and multiple input describing function, have been broadly compared for validation.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.