Xiaozhe Wang, Zhiqiang Wan, Chao Yang

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2017-209

The multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) has the potential in large aircraft design. An integrated optimization method of large aircraft in conceptual phase is presented. The objective is the minimum stiffness of a beam-frame wing structure subject to aeroelastic, aerodynamic and stability constraints. The aeroelastic responses are calculated by commercial software MSC. Nastran, and the cruise stability is evaluated by the linear small-disturbance equations. A viscous-inviscid iteration method provided by commercial CFD solver MGAERO is used for computing the flow over the model. To reduce the computational burden and explore the entire design space, the evaluation of the responses in optimization is performed using Kriging model. The optimization method is validated by application to the wing of a complete aircraft. All the responses are computed in the trim condition with a fixed maximum takeoff weight. Genetic algorithm (GA) is utilized for global optimizations, and the optimal jig shape, the elastic axis positions and the stiffness distribution of the wing can be attained simultaneously, avoiding the iteration design.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: 1. IFASD 2017, 1.Events, Aeroelasticity in Conceptual Aircraft Design
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.