Manuel Reyes, Hector Climent, Moti Karpel, Felix Arévalo, Carlos Maderuelo

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2017-165

The inclusion of the Increased Order Modeling (IOM) methodology in the industry has provided means to address problems where concentrated non-linear effects of any kind are important while increasing the speed of standard aeroelastic calculations. This type of problems could only be addressed before by linearization techniques or by dedicated separated tools to approach each type of non-linearity. This paper summarizes and details the following cases where this approach has been used at Airbus Defence & Space:

  • Non-linear Flight Control System (FCS) in gust response.
  • Non-linear boundary conditions in Aerial Refueling Boom System operation.
  • Control surface freeplay induced loads calculation due to Limit Cycle Oscillation (LCO).
  • Non-linear stiffness and rupture of elastomeric devices during a turbopropeller Blade Loss event.
  • Non-linear aerodynamic forces. Special attention is given to ease of implementation, robustness, calculation speed and upstream and downstream compatibility with the general dynamic loads calculation process.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: 1. IFASD 2017, 1.Events, Reduced Order Modeling
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.