Jurij Sodja , Federico Roizner, Roeland De Breuker, Moti Karpel

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2017-184

The first experimental application of the Parametric Flutter Margin method for identification of aeroelastic instabilities is presented. The experiment was performed in two steps using a two degree-of-freedom wing model mounted in the wind tunnel. First, the reference flutter and divergence conditions were found by increasing the airstream velocity until the observed response diverged. Then, the system was stabilized according to the Parametric Flutter Margin methodology, and the flutter and divergence conditions of the original wing were identified positively while being in a stable regime demonstrating excellent agreement with the reference instability conditions. Although, the new experimental methodology is not model based, the results were compared with a theoretical model showing good agreement as well. The acquired data proves both the accuracy of the Parametric Flutter Margin method as well as its capability to test for aeroelastic instabilities, both flutter and divergence, in stable and predictive testing conditions.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: 1. IFASD 2017, 1.Events, Experimental Methods in Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.