R. Heinrich, L. Reimer

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2017-091

Two different methods for modeling of atmospheric effects have been implemented into the CFD code TAU. The first one is the so called disturbance velocity approach, a simplified method which allows predicting the influence of gusts or wake vortices on the aircraft, but not vice versa. Alternatively, an unsteady boundary condition has been implemented to feed in the atmospheric disturbances into the flow field. Thereby the mutual interaction of atmospheric disturbances and aircraft is captured. Both methods are compared for 3D applications in order to access the validity range of the simplified approach. A result is that the simplified approach is sufficient accurate for scenarios relevant for the certification process of aircraft. Even for a gust wavelength down to one reference chord length the agreement of the highly accurate method and simplified approach is fair. To demonstrate the capability of the simplified method for industrial applications, the maneuver of a generic fighter configuration through the wake vortices of an aircraft in front is simulated. The reaction of the aircraft due to the additional loads has been taken into account by coupling of CFD with flight mechanics.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: 1. IFASD 2017, 1.Events, Dynamic loads
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.