Robert G. Cook, Chris J. A. Wales, Ann L. Gaitonde, Dorian P. Jones, Jonathan E. Cooper

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2017-047

In this work, a typical industrial gust loads process has been adapted for use with a nonlinear aeroelastic system. This gust loads process is carried out to determine the worst case “1-minus-cosine” loads on different flexibility variations of a representative, high-aspect ratio, UAV wing, which is subject to uncertain atmospheric and structural properties. Polynomial chaos expansion-based techniques are then used to replicate the map from input uncertainty to the output uncertainties of particular quantities of interest. The results obtained from the nonlinear analysis are compared to linear results to understand what effect nonlinearities have on the propagation of uncertainties through the system. Significant differences in the linear and nonlinear outputs are found using deterministic analyses alone, but additionally, the uncertainty bounds also show differences. For example, for some quantities such as static loads or angle of attack the uncertainty bounds are higher for the nonlinear system than for the linear system. However, the opposite is seen for most of the gust loads, apart from root torque loads on the most flexible case, indicating that the effect of nonlinearities on uncertainty propagation can not be easily generalised. Furthermore, the necessity for round-the-clock gusts for highly flexible aircraft is highlighted.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.