Julien Ertveldt, Alfredo Lamberti, Ben De Pauw, Ali Rezayat, Rik Pintelon, Steve Vanlanduit

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2017-063

The dynamic response of a cantilever wing at small and large angles of attack was tested using the Active Aeroelastic Test Bench (AATB) in the wind tunnel at low wind velocity (8 m/s, Re ≈ 120, 000). The compliant wing was excited at the root of the wing with a small 2° pitch angle. Advantage was taken from the fact that the AATB allows for arbitrary excitation of the wing in pitch and plunge at its constrained root. This property is exploited in order to excite the wing with an odd random phase multisine. The response of the instrumented wing was recorded by using both fibre Bragg grating (FBG) optical strain gauges and piezoelectric accelerometers. Using the spectral properties of the applied odd random phase multisine, the level of stochastic nonlinear distortions and the Best Linear Approximation (BLA) of the FRF was estimated for different angles of attack. A clear increase of the level of stochastic nonlinearities was observed when increasing the angle of attack up to 17.5°. These distortions were mainly focussed around the resonance frequencies and in the very low frequency range. This latter could only be observed in the measurements of the FBG strain gauges due to the high pass filter effect of the piezoelectric accelerometers. Comparison of the identified BLA with gust response measurements showed that in general good predictions from the BLA model were possible when the Signal to Distortion Ratio (SDR) was above 10 dB. For the tested wing this was for angles of up to 12°. Above this angle all resonance frequencies were still well approximated both in frequency and amplitude, however, a very important low frequency contribution was missing from the predicted data.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.