Pawel Chwalowski, Walter A. Silva, Carol D. Wieseman and Jennifer Heeg

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2017-044

This paper presents the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model of the flow in the NASA Langley Research Center Transonic Dynamics Tunnel (TDT) with some recent applications. The TDT is a continuous-flow, closed circuit, slotted-test-section wind tunnel with a 16by 16-foot test section with cropped corners. The tunnel was originally built as the 19-ft Pressure Tunnel in 1938, but it was converted to the current transonic tunnel in the 1950s, with capabilities to use either air or heavy gas at pressures from atmosphere down to near vacuum. In this study, experimental data acquired in the empty tunnel using R-134a as the test medium was used to calibrate the computational data. Experimental data from a recent TDT test of a full-span fighter configuration in air was then selected for comparison with the numerical data. During this test, the configuration experienced a flutter event in the transonic flow regime. Numerically, the flutter event is simulated both inside the CFD model of the TDT and in a classical free-air model. The preliminary results show that the wind-tunnel walls do affect the response of the tested vehicle but do not affect overall flutter prediction.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: 1. IFASD 2017, 1.Events, Computational Aeroelasticity
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.