Seung-Min JEONG, Jae-Eun KIM, Jeong-Yeol CHOI

DOI Number: 10.60853/07a4-dk14

Conference number: HiSST-2024-00350

This study numerically investigated the reactive flow dynamics of a laboratory-scale gaseous hydrogenfueled scramjet combustor depending on a number of injectors. The main goal of the present study is not only to investigate a flame structure and combustion dynamics by changing fueling schemes but also to reveal the effect of injector schemes on combustion performance. A numerical simulation was performed using an improved delayed detached eddy turbulent model (IDDES) and Jachimowski’s hydrogen-air reaction mechanism. The simulation utilized high-order accuracy-based numerical schemes to ensure high-resolution and fidelity results. For a quantitative comparison of the effect of injector schemes, single and multi-injectors with five equivalence ratio cases in one set were considered. Numerical results found an intricate coupled fluid-combustion dynamics and its transition depending on the number of injectors and global equivalence ratio. Comprehensive numerical results showed completely different fluid-combustion dynamics by injector schemes. Specifically, a counter-rotating vortex pair of the multi-injector case was not maintained, resulting in decreased fuel/air mixing and combustion. Due to this phenomenon induced by an interaction between the injector-injector and injector-wall surface, it was revealed that the combustion efficiency is significantly reduced for the multi-injector compared to the single-injector under the same global equivalence ratio. These findings indicated that increasing the number of injectors cannot guarantee an increase in the mixing and combustion performance of a scramjet combustor.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.