Leonardo Luca MELLONE, Giuseppe Maria INFANTE, Mario De Stefano FUMO, Giuseppe Carmine RUFOLO

DOI Number: 10.60853/wfqf-mg41

Conference number: HiSST2024-00342

The objective of the work is to predict the value of the Steps and Gaps among the windward shingles that could be a critical issue for re-entry vehicle. To achieve this goal efficiently, a computational cost-saving approach was adopted through the use of a homogenized model. The windward TPS (Thermal Protection System) consists of flat and curved shingles, as well as complex Hinge TPS elements, connected to the structure with an attachment system designed for rigidity, flexibility, and thermal insulation. The presence of discontinuities like protuberances, cavities, gaps, or steps on the vehicle’s surface can impact the aerodynamic characteristics and heat transfer rates during high-speed flight, potentially leading to catastrophic consequences. The optimization of the Standoff’s placement is crucial to mitigate in-flight deformations, which influence thermal flow behaviour and windward deformations. The homogenization process involves accurately defining the mechanical and thermal properties of the structural components, specifically the Standoff, through iterative tuning. The analyses focus on monitoring results along the shingle edges and deformations along the contour. The homogenized model simplifies the complex Standoff structure while maintaining accuracy, leading to reliable results in reduced timeframes. The obtained results were validated through cross-validation with three-dimensional models, reducing the maximum average error to a few tenths of a millimetre. Conventions for step and gap definitions were established, and an algorithm was developed to obtain outcomes within the local reference system of each curved shingle edge element. Despite the introduction of some approximation in the results, particularly for Steps, they are considered reliable when calculated as average values and are consistent with 3D models and reference literature.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.