Valeria BORIO, Roberta FUSARO, Nicole VIOLA, Guido SACCONE2, Ginevra CIANCI

DOI Number: 10.82241/ceas-hisst-2024-334

Conference number: HiSST-2024-334

This paper aims to investigate the P3-T3 method originally developed for nitrogen oxide emissions estimation of subsonic kerosene-fuelled aircraft and to extend its applicability to an unconventional high-speed propulsive system and to hydrogen fuelling. For this purpose, the introduction of two new variables, namely the Mach number and the Damköhler number, proves to extend the applicability of the analytical formulation up to Mach 8. The new formulation is developed thanks to the availability of 1D chemical-kinetic simulations of the combustor of the Dual-Mode Ramjet engine installed onboard the STRATOFLY MR3 vehicle, a hypersonic civil transportation vehicle with a waverider configuration. Moreover, in an effort to verify the independence of the novel P3-T3 formulation from the reference emissive database, the DLR-Stöppler formulation was considered. The upgrade of the P3-T3 method allows the mean estimation error to be reduced from 17.28%, resulting from the original formulation, to 0.399% of the novel formulation. The updated DLR-Stöppler method provided nitrogen oxide emissions assessments with a mean error of 0.405%, comparable with those of the novel P3-T3 method.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: 1.Events, HiSST 2024, Propulsion Systems and Components
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.