Jimmy-John HOSTE, Tobias ECKER, Chiara AMATO, Nicholas GIBBONS, Doyle KNIGHT, Fahri Erinç HIZIR, Tolga KÖKTÜRK, Artemii SATTAROV, Olivier THIRY, Jean-Pierre HICKEY, Steven QIANG, Jim CODER, Neil CASTELINO, Valerio VITI

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2024-302

As part of the AVT-352 on hypersonic turbulence, a code-to-code comparison has been initiated to evaluate the status of RANS modeling for such flows. To this end, two sharp cone-flare geometries, experimentally studied at CUBRC have been selected for study. Each geometry has been run at various conditions enabling a larger sampling for the various participating CFD codes and turbulence models. The nature of the physics found in cone-flare geometries are known to be extremely challenging for RANS CFD codes. This paper presents an initial status on this endeavor, describing the setups, conditions and general simulating strategies. Initial simulations confirm the typical overpredictions of pressure and heat flux along the wall after the region of separation.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.