Youngil KO, Eunji JUN

DOI Number: XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference number: HiSST2024-00202

Designing a Thermal Protection System (TPS) for re-entry vehicles requires numerical methods due to
the difficulties in experimentally replicating the highly non-equilibrium flows. The Direct Simulation
Monte Carlo (DSMC) method stands out for its effectiveness in capturing the non-equilibrium
characteristics. This study assesses the effects of different molecular models and relaxation schemes
within DSMC on the simulation of rarefied hypersonic flow around a 2D cylinder. Results show that the
choice of molecular model and gas-phase relaxation scheme affects the surface heat flux and flowfield
temperature prediction, respectively. Furthermore, a parametric analysis of the surface catalytic
recombination in DSMC is conducted by adjusting the surface recombination coefficient, 𝛾 . The
noncatalytic surface (𝛾 = 0) and fully-catalytic surface (𝛾 = 1) serve as the upper and lower bounds of
the predicted total heat flux. Additionally, the chemical heat flux at the stagnation point increases with
the surface recombination coefficient, due to the exothermicity of the recombination reaction, while
translation heat flux remains nearly unaffected by surface catalysis.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.