Haoyang LI, Zijian ZHANG, Chun WANG

DOI Number: XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference number: HiSST2024-00208

This paper presents a pioneering shock-detonation reflection theory and solves the transition criteria to provide a valuable reference for future oblique detonation engine (ODE) design. Initially, we investigate the structure of the oblique detonation wave (ODW) when the deflection angle θ is less than θCJ. We note that the numerical results differ from the theoretical solution predicted by weak underdriven (WU) ODW. When θ < θCJ, a Chapman-Jouguet (CJ) ODW followed by a Prandtl-Meyer isentropic expansion (P-M IE) wave is obtained. In light of this finding, we introduce a CJ + P-M IE theory to reconstruct the relationship between pressure p and θ for the segment of WU detonation polar. Together with the segment of overdriven detonation polar, a whole detonation polar is established. Then, we provide a shock-detonation reflection theory combining the traditional shock polar and the new detonation polar. By analyzing the steady regular reflection (RR) and Mach reflection (MR) structures, we found that the key flow field characteristics, such as the angle of the slip line and reflected ODW, corroborate well with the theory. This verifies the accuracy of shock-detonation reflection theory. Subsequently, we solve the detachment criterion and von Neumann (VN) criterion according to the shock-detonation reflection theory. There are two crucial threshold values: critical heat release QC and critical Mach number MC. When Q < QC, the section of the WU ODW is not employed in the reflection theory. When M < MC, the solution of the VN criterion will be absent. Finally, the transition criteria are verified by numerical simulation under two different heat release Q. The numerical detachment and VN angles are coincident with the theoretical ones. The computations can confirm that the shock-detonation reflection theory and transition criteria are correct in our study.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.