Yue WANG, Yun Peng WANG

DOI Number: XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference number: HiSST 2024-00132

Parallel-staged two-stage-to-orbiter (TSTO) vehicle is one of the promising next-generation reusable launch vehicles and comprises the booster and the orbiter. However, the TSTO hypersonic stage separation introduces strong shock waves and results in complex aerodynamic interaction into the interstage flowfield, which increases the risk of the stage separation and would determine the success of the launch mission. Thus, the longitudinal stage separation (LSS) is proposed, in which the orbiter accelerates along the upper surface of the booster with the unnoticeable interstage gap, so the strong shock-shock interaction (SSI) might be absent in the interstage flowfield. The dynamic tests of the TSTO stage separation are conducted in the JF-12 hypersonic flight condition duplicated shock tunnel at Mach 7. The TSTO vehicle comprises the wave-rider and the spaceplane as the booster and the orbiter. The dynamic test methodology of the multi-body vehicle stage separation in the short effective test time ground facility is clarified, including the high-speed pneumatic ejection to launch vehicle model system (HPELS) to make the LSS and high-speed Schlieren visualization and image processing techniques to capture the separation trajectory. Besides, the unsteady shock wave structure and wall pressure are also observed and examined. The LSS of the TSTO vehicle in the JF-12 shock tunnel is examined at angles of attack (AoA) of 8.3 and 4.5 deg. The results show that the small interstage gap of LSS leads to weak type I and VI SSI, with short-duration weak shock reflections at a high AoA. Furthermore, no shock reflection is observed at a small AoA. Additionally, no stage re-contact is observed, and the safety and feasibility of the LSS principle for the parallel-staged TSTO vehicle are demonstrated.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.