Wenguo LUO, Changkai HAO, Jianfeng ZHU, Yancheng YOU

DOI Number: XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference number: HiSST 2024-00114

Based on the computational principle of the inverse characteristic method, an inverse design method that can specify the compression process of the two-dimensional captured flow tube is developed for the external-compression multi-wave flowfield of curved surface compression. On this basis, it is proposed that a kind of configuration for curved shock system with the same intensity distribution in the capture height direction. An index parameter Ks named surface compression efficiency ratio is introduced to measure the performance of the equal-intensity-distribution flowfield. The both characteristics of the total pressure recovery and the compression efficiency in the cases of different shock numbers are emphatically studied. In addition, the compression limit of curved shock system is discussed when the initial shock wave is given in different function forms. The results show that enhancing the curved compression characteristics of the initial shock wave, rather than adding one or two shock waves, could be possible to achieve a total pressure recovery equivalent to or even better than that of the straight shock system, so as to simplify the flowfield wave system. Limiting the curvature of the initial shock wave within a certain range could improve the compression efficiency, achieving the reasonable allocation of shock compression and isentropic compression.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.