Andrija DABANOVIC, Joël MARTIN, Stefan MAY, Viola WARTEMANN

DOI Number: XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference number: HiSST 2024-00120

In chemical propulsion, propellant masses are generally the largest part of the overall weight. Hence,
combustion efficiency is a key aspect of the system’s performance and small improvements within the
combustion process can result in significant changes in project costs or mission longevity. To analyze
detailed chemical and physical processes, direct measurements are cost-intensive and limited to lab-
scale devices. Numerical investigations have therefore become a widely used tool to simulate the inner
flow and combustion of propulsion systems. In hybrid rocket engines, post-combustion chambers are
used to improve the mixing and combustion process. Nevertheless, these components imply additional
structural mass and engine length. This study analyzes the influence of different post-combustion
chamber lengths on the combustion efficiency. The simulations were performed in two-dimensional,
axisymmetric domains with fuel mass flow and detailed combustion modeling. The efficiency is shown
to increase linearly with increasing post-chamber length. However, it is significantly influenced by
turbulator components. With these results, the qualitative influence of post-combustion chambers is
analyzed, enabling optimization of engine design while ensuring sufficient combustion efficiency.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.