In-hoi KOO, Keon-Hyeong LEE, Jeong-Yeol CHOI

DOI Number: 10.60853/fty5-bx66

Conference number: HiSST-2024-00115

In this study, the operation characteristics of the rotating detonation engine (RDE) are confirmed by the shape of the fuel injector that affects the RDE performance. The experiment utilizes a slit-type fuel injector with a 2-dimensional effect and a hole-type fuel injector with a 3-dimensional effect originating from side vortex such as counter-rotating vortex pairs. It is quite similar to the fuel injection structure of RDE and the transverse jet in supersonic crossflow (JISC). The tendency of the jet penetration affecting the fuel performance was confirmed and quantified. The jet moment ratio of gaseous ethylene injected perpendicularly to the flow of gaseous oxygen was calculated, and the jet penetration height was obtained by using the empirical correlation. The relationship between gaseous ethylene and gaseous oxygen stagnation pressure was derived according to the calculated jet penetration height and RDE channel width. The detonation rate was confirmed by fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis, and the hole-type fuel injector showed a 10% higher value than the slit-type fuel injector. In addition, when the hole-type experimental results were compared, it was inferred that there was a correlation between the jet moment ratio and the fuel mixing performance.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.