Daniel BODMER, Jacob JÄSCHKE, Florian LINKE, Volker GOLLNICK

DOI Number: XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference number: HiSST 2024-00116

In atmospheric physics, the impact of gaseous engine emissions on climate is quantified using complex 3D simulations, which are computationally intensive and consequently require a long simulation time. Since climate impact depends on the time and locus of an emission, especially with respect to the non-CO2 effects such as NOx emissions, climate-optimized flight trajectories might be higher (or lower) than emission-optimized flight trajectories. This paper aims to present a methodology for deriving the minimum nitrogen oxide (NOx) or water vapor (H2O) trajectory of hydrogen-powered hypersonic aircraft taking into account realistic operational constraints such as tolerable passenger loads as well as the sonic-boom carpet propagation. The methodology is demonstrated using the civil Mach 8 waverider reference configuration STRATOFLY-MR3, which yields significant mitigation potential for both NOx and H2O emissions along the aircraft’s 4D-trajectory by varying the cruise flight altitude. The obtained results can be used as a simplified metric for climate impact predictions at stratospheric altitudes and are expressed as relative changes with respect to the aircraft’s design criteria defined in the H2020 project STRATOFLY. Results are presented for a global fleet of 200 MR3 aircraft operating 360 days per year on the design route from Brussels to Sydney. As a scientific contribution, emission inventories for the optimized mission scenario will be produced and made publicly available.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.