Ansgar MARWEGE, Daniel KIRCHHECK, Ali GÜLHAN

DOI Number: 10.60853/qw4e-qp62

Conference number: HiSST-2024-00100

High uncertainties exist in modeling subsonic retro propulsion flow fields with CFD. For example, the choice of the turbulence model can greatly influence the flow field and the resulting heat loads. Hence, experiments with hot oxygen/hydrogen exhaust plumes and active counterflow are indispensable for the understanding of these flow fields. In the frame of the Horizon 2020 project RETALT first subsonic retro propulsion experiments with hydrogen-oxygen combustion in the Vertical Free Jet Facility Cologne (VMK) have been performed. Oxidizer fuel ratios of around 0.7 were tested at Mach numbers of 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9. The stagnation pressures in the model were around 21 bar. The steady and unsteady flow field features were analysed with regular video recordings, Schlieren and infrared recordings. Furthermore, the pressures and temperatures in the base area were evaluated. The tests are compared to earlier cold gas tests of the same configuration. The steady flow field features are similar to those in cold gas test. However, the unsteady features prove to be very different. A general tendency of the dependence of the plume length on the momentum flux ratio, found in could gas tests, can be confirmed. However, the plume length is larger in the hot tests. The dominant frequencies found in cold gas tests in the modes of the Schlieren recordings differ from those found in the hot gas tests. In the future, methane experiments are foreseen and an improved model concept shall enable higher oxidizer-fuel-ratios and, therefore, a better similarity to the flight conditions.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.