Chihiro FUJIO, Sasi Kiran PALATEERDHAM, Lakshmi Narayana Phaneendra PERI, Hideaki OGAWA, Antonella INGENITO

DOI Number: XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference number: HiSST 2024- 0076

Designing scramjet combustors is one of the most crucial yet challenging tasks in developing a scramjet engine, primarily due to its complex aerothermal and chemical phenomena as well as high computational cost that is inherently incurred in the design process. The cost issue has prohibited the global design exploration of scramjet combustors while further improvement of scramjet performance necessitates such design techniques including multi-objective and global design optimization. The present study enables multi-objective design optimization (MDO) of scramjet combustors by developing a cost-efficient and robust MDO framework. This framework incorporates evolutionary algorithms, Bayesian optimization, and stochastic surrogate modeling. It warrants significant reduction of computational costs by reducing the number of solution evaluations while ensuring the robustness of the solution search against the inaccuracy of surrogate modeling. In the present study, a cavity-based two-dimensional scramjet combustor is optimized for hydrogen combustion with respect to thrust and combustion efficiency. A detailed post-analysis of the optimization results provides valuable physical insights into scramjet combustor design, and the findings are summarized as the optimal design strategies for cavity-based scramjet combustors.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.