Rajesh Kumar CHINNARAJ, Young Chan KIM, Seong Man CHOI

DOI Number: 10.60853/rjav-rj31

Conference Number: HiSST-2024-0026

For spacecraft heat shield applications, we developed a dual-layer carbon-phenolic/silica phenolic ablator. The development of this dual-layer ablator began with testing a carbon-phenolic material with two different lamination angles of 0° and 30°, using a high-velocity oxygen fuel (HVOF) material ablation test facility. Based on HVOF results, the 30° carbon-phenolic material (used as a recession layer) is selected as the base for the dual-layer ablator. The 30° carbon-phenolic material was augmented with a silica-phenolic material (used as an insulating layer) and tested in a 0.4 MW supersonic arc-jet plasma wind tunnel. In plasma wind tunnel tests, dual-layer ablator specimens with varying thicknesses of carbon-phenolic layers and different surface shapes (flat-faced and hemispherical-faced) were tested. The plasma wind tunnel tests showed the specimen silica-phenolic recession layer internal temperatures were well below the set design limit of 453.15 K (180 °C). The surface temperatures of the hemispherical-faced specimens measured around 3000 K, approximately 350 K higher than those of the flat-faced specimens, leading to elevated internal temperatures. Under identical test conditions, hemispherical-faced specimens exhibited approximately 1.4 times greater recession and mass loss compared to the flat-faced specimens.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.