Bora O. Cakir, Guillaume Grossir, Sébastien Paris, Bayindir H. Saracoglu

DOI Number XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference Number HiSST-2022-409

The operational map of the H3 Mach 6 blowdown wind tunnel, operated at the von Karman Institute for
Fluid Dynamics (VKI), is extended towards lower Mach numbers. The main characteristics of the present
wind tunnel facility are first reviewed and their performance restrictions are analyzed. Accordingly, the
operating regimes and the corresponding performance characteristics of the supersonic ejector is in-
vestigated as it is identified to be the most critical component for achieving the desired modifications.
Then, the design methodology of a new contoured axisymmetric nozzle enabling operation at Mach 5
and high Reynolds numbers is reported. The design space for the new nozzle is analyzed by means
of a parametric study for the nozzle contour and an optimum set of parameters that yields the best
performances are identified (core flow diameter, Reynolds number). The design space is confined in
order to meet the different design constraints associated with the existing framework (i.e. dimensional
restrictions, ejectable mass flow rates, heating requirements). Finally, Navier-Stokes computations of
the flow development over the newly designed Mach 5 nozzle are performed to serve as an estimate of
the expected radial and axial flow uniformity within the core flow.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: HiSST 2022
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.