Kan Kobayashi, Sadatake Tomioka, Masahiro Takahashi, and Masatoshi Kodera

DOI Number XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference Number HiSST-2022-187

To build a reduced reaction mechanism for 3D simulation of C2H4/Air reaction in supersonic
combustion ramjet combustor, CHEMKIN-Pro was used. USC Mech II (111 species mechanism) was
applied as a master mechanism. First, 1D simulation was conducted by applying so-called plug flow
reactor model and 34, 23, 20, 18, and 19 species mechanisms were suggested as candidates of reduced
mechanisms. In addition, 0D ignition delay simulation by applying so-called perfectly stirred reactor
model by CHEMKIN-Pro, 2D reacting flow simulation by CRUNCH CFD, and 3D reacting flow simulation
by RANS were performed to choose the most suitable reduced model. As a result, the 20 species (96
reactions) mechanism which consists of H2, O2, N2, H2O, CO2, CO, H, O, OH, HO2, CH2, CH2*, CH3,
HCO, CH2O, CH3O, C2H2, C2H3, C2H4, and CH2CHO was selected as the best reduced reaction
mechanism for C2H4 fueled 3D simulation.

Read the full paper >

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.