Sébastien Paris, Jean-Baptiste Gouriet, Jimmy Freitas Monteiro, Johan Steelant

DOI Number XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference Number HiSST-2022-92

This paper deals with the qualification tests of the COTS Aeroguard® thermal protection
panels used as internal Thermal Control System (TCS) inside the Hexafly-Int glider and as
external Thermal Protection System (TPS) of its service module dedicated to the insertion
into the atmosphere. Three different set of tests were performed: (i) Oven tests so as to
qualify the thermal behaviour of the TCS especially when submitted to depressurization
inside the vehicle which is supposed to reduce by an order f the magnitude the thermal
conductivity of the panels (ii) Centrifuge tests so as to assess the mechanical strength of
different types of fixations between the airframe and the TCS during the boosted ascent
phase of the flight (iii) Wind tunnel tests so as assess the strength of ESM external thermal
protection panels. The main results are: (i) Insulation properties of the internal TCS is
much less as expected and will lead to a redesign of the TCS (ii) The fixations based on
lateral traps made with Velcro are far from the most resistant with respect to g-loads (iii)
External panels of the ESM are able to withstand the aerodynamic load.

Read the full paper >

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.