Masahiro Takahashi, Kan Kobayashi, Sadatake Tomioka

DOI Number XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference Number HiSST-2022-250

A flight-ground test comparison program is undergoing at JAXA to clarify so-called “facility effect” on
hypersonic aerodynamics and combustion phenomena, and to develop a CFD tool, which can predict
actual data in flight from ground test data. The final goal is to conduct a flight experiment to obtain
data of aerodynamic heating and supersonic combustion in a real flight and to validate the CFD tool
using the flight data and corresponding ground test data. The present study is related to design of a
supersonic combustor flow-path suitable to clarify influence of differences in test flow composition
between flight and ground test conditions on combustion. The candidate configurations proposed by
CFD study were evaluated by direct-connect combustion tests with ethylene fuel. The results showed
that a combustor flow was symmetric when fuel equivalence ratio was low, while it became asymmetric
when the equivalence ratio became high and the pressure in the combustor rose. Such the asymmetric
flow is not suitable for the CFD validation so that the total equivalence ratio was limited. The upper
limit of the total equivalence ratio to maintain the symmetric combustor flow was 0.44 in the present
flow condition. The combustor model equipped two-stage fuel injectors and cavity flame holders to
obtain ethylene combustion. A depth of the cavity flame holder had little influence on combustion, but
the number of injection holes for the 2nd injector located downstream of the cavity affected the
combustor pressure. Based on the combustion test results, the combustor flow-path design was
finalized. In addition, an ethylene fuel ignition method using a pilot hydrogen injection, which is
adopted for the flight experiment, was also demonstrated successfully.

Read the full paper >

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.