A.N. Kraiko , A.D. Egoryan

DOI Number XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference Number HiSST 2018_3000970

In connection with the allegations of a possible significant increase in thrust characteristics when replacing air-breathing jet engines with deflagration combustion (RAMJET) to engines with combustion in detonation waves (pulsating – PDE and rotating – RDE), a comparison of ramjet engines of different schemes with deflagration and detonation combustion was performed. The comparison is based on the simplest models of thermodynamics, detonation wave, air braking, expansion of combustion products in perfectly adjustable nozzles and unsteady flows in combustion chambers. Within such models, with a fixed adiabatic index, the characteristics of each engine depend on two parameters — the flight Mach number and the dimensionless calorific value of the combustible mixture. The comparison for the real values of these parameters with the analysis of thermodynamic cycles and one-dimensional unsteady calculations (for engines with combustion in detonation waves or at a constant volume) confirmed the importance of taking into account nonstationary processes in combustion chambers. Statements about the advantages of detonation combustion are made on the basis of comparison of ideal thermal coefficients of efficiency and calculated on them also ideal specific thrust and impulses. If the process in the combustion chamber is unsteady, and even with the shock waves arising from the reflection of the detonation wave from its ends, the recalculation of thrust and impulse according to thermal efficiency is wrongful. The validity of the above for multi-chamber PDE was confirmed by unsteady calculations with instantaneous opening and closing of the detonation chamber valve and instantaneous initiation of the detonation wave without energy costs. According to the calculations, the PDE thrust is obtained less than the thrust of a RAMJET, starting from small supersonic Mach numbers. A similar calculation for RDE is wrongful due to the strong (even for narrow cylindrical chambers) spatial non-uniformity of the parameters and non-inertiality of rotating reference frame.

Read the full paper from the AIP Publishing website >

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.