Ke Dai  , Wen-Jiang Xu , Jian Teng , Jian-Feng Zhu , Yan-Cheng You

DOI Number XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference Number HiSST 2018_1780869

In this paper, buzz phenomenon of a typical supersonic inlet is analyzed using unsteady RANS simulation and proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) method. The numerical results are first compared with previous experimental data and achieve good agreement, in terms of pressure oscillation frequency within the inlet. Then, dominant flow patterns and characteristics of the buzzed flow are obtained by decoupling the computed pressure field into spatial and temporal sub-parts using the POD method. On the basis of POD results, a one-dimensional (1D) model, which approximates the original flow field, is proposed by taking into account only the first-order POD mode. The resulted mathematical model is used to describe the spatiotemporal pressure oscillation features. Finally, the standard deviation of the unsteady pressure field from both numerical simulation and model prediction are compared. Limited discrepancy can be observed and the good agreement validates the credibility of the proposed 1D model. Therefore, the supersonic inlet buzz phenomenon studied in this work can be approximated as a product of decoupled temporal and spatial terms. It is believed that the model proposed here can serve as a good candidate for quick and onboard analysis of the complicated inlet buzz phenomenon.

Read the full paper from the MDPI website>

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.