Tobias Hermann , Hassan Saad Ifti , Matthew McGilvray , Luke Doherty , Rowland Penty Geraets

DOI Number XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference Number HiSST 2018_720804

This paper presents transpiration cooling experiments conducted in the Oxford High Density Tunnel. The flow structure and mixing phenomena between the injected coolant gas and the hypersonic free stream are investigated. A flat plate model is used which is equipped with a gas injection system, four surface mounted heat flux gauges and three surface pressure sensors located downstream of the injection point. Mass injection is realized through a porous ceramic material, and alternatively through a series of slots. Spatially and temporally resolved film effectiveness downstream of the injection point is measured with fast response pressure sensitive paint. The flowfield is visualised by a Z-type Schlieren imaging system. Results show a significant influence of injection on the boundary layer thickness through the additional coolant gas. High blowing ratios can lead to early transition which increases coolant-external flow mixing and leads to a lower film effectiveness. Transpiration cooling requires approximately two orders of magnitude lower blowing ratios to achieve a similar film coverage as in the case of the injection through slots. The film effectiveness increases with an increasing blowing ratio for locations close to the injection point. However, a lower blowing ratio results in a more stable film for locations further downstream.

Download the full paper from the Oxford website>

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.