SAEED HOSSEINI; MOHAMMAD ALI VAZIRY-ZANJANY; HAMID REZA OVESY

DOI Number: 10.13009/EUCASS2023-007

A design optimization methodology is implemented in a multidisciplinary aircraft design framework to optimize a regional very-high aspect ratio truss-braced wing aircraft layout considering both cost and emission requirements. A detailed emission model is incorporated to calculate the emission masses and temperature responses due to the engine emissions. Since the design variables include the mission param­eters, namely the cruise altitude and cruise Mach number, an engine sizing module based on the thermo­dynamic cycle is integrated into the design. The results show that the optimum configuration for emission and cost are quietly different. The emission objective drives the design toward lower cruise altitudes and Mach numbers (i.e. 20 [kft] and Mach 0.4), while the cost objective drives the design toward higher Mach numbers and altitudes. The reason is found to be the mechanism by which these emissions are formed and affect the temperature rise, particularly the altitude at which these emissions are created. At the end, the effect of engine bypass ratio, and mission profile (cruise altitude and cruise speed) are analyzed.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.