Frédéric OLIVON, Antoine CHÉDIN, Jean-Etienne DURAND, Aurélien GENOT, Estelle PIOT

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-042

The indirect entropy noise generation in a thermally choked flow nozzle, induced by the convection of 2D circular entropy spots, is investigated. Two configurations are examined: a thermal throat formed by non-uniform volumetric heat addition, and an equivalent isentropic nozzle with a geometric throat. Both are designed to produce the same steady Mach number distribution, in order to isolate the influence of heat addition on the acoustic response. The analysis combines two-dimensional CFD simulations with two asymptotic one-dimensional models: the quasi-steady (QSS) model, adapted for large spots, and the point-mass (PM) inertial model, for small spots. For the geometric-throat case, the CFD results
show fair agreement with both the QSS and PM predictions in their respective asymptotic regimes. For the thermal-throat case, the QSS regime is reached for spots larger than 100 throat radius, which is a value lower than that of the geometric configuration. Then, the acoustic response exceeds QSS predictions (∼ 20%), which is certainly due to the invalidity of the assumption of no Mach fluctuations at the throat. In the small-spot limit, the PM model predicts the inertial regime with reasonable accuracy for both configurations, but at different spot radii. The thermal-throat case, however, deviates from the PM prediction, highlighting fundamental differences between heated and isentropic nozzles and the need to
extend asymptotic models to non-isentropic base flows.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.