Jascha WILKEN, Aaron D. KOCH

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-066

Thermal Protection System (TPS) design is a critical challenge for hypersonic vehicles, where the system must withstand extreme reentry heating without adding excessive mass. Conventional methods often rely on conservative assumptions, which can lead to overdesigned systems. This paper takes a first exploratory step toward incorporating uncertainty quantification into TPS design, using the SpaceLiner point-to-point passenger transport concept as a reference case. A toolchain was implemented that combines trajectory optimization, aerothermal database generation, and simplified TPS sizing to explore the influence of input uncertainties. The study considers variations in lift and drag coefficients, velocity, flight path angle, altitude, and the transition Reynolds number. Using Sobol sampling, 512 trajectories were generated and analyzed to estimate impacts on TPS mass
and regional distribution. As expected, the results suggest that uncertainties in the heat flux estimation and the transition to turbulent flow exert the largest influence on TPS design, while initial altitude plays only a minor role. Some outcomes are counterintuitive: For example, reduced velocity or higher drag lead to lower-altitude trajectories, increasing thermal loads and TPS mass. Clustering analysis further reveals distinct groups of trajectories and TPS results, underscoring the coupled nature of the problem. Overall, the work demonstrates how uncertainty quantification can provide additional insight into the sensitivity of TPS design. While simplified, this approach highlights key drivers and trade-offs, and points toward more balanced methods for future hypersonic vehicle studies.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.