Sijia Gao, Han Peng, Zhipeng Sun, Huan Lian, Yue Huang, Zijun Zhou, Yancheng You

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-137

Rotating detonation waves exhibit different propagation modes under varying operating conditions. Two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations and a kerosene/air reaction model based on RYrhoCentralFoam solver were used to simulate the non-premixed two-phase rotating detonation combustion. The transformation trends and evolution processes of the propagation modes of the rotating detonation wave were analyzed in response to variations in the total temperature of the incoming flow and in the fuel droplet proportion. Additionally, the vaporization rate of liquid fuel within the flow field was examined, and the third Damköhler number as well as the transient Rayleigh index of the rotating detonation combustion flow were calculated. The results indicate that increasing the total temperature of the incoming flow and decreasing the fuel droplet proportion lead to an increase
in the number of detonation waves. Higher incoming flow temperatures correspond to lower peak pressures of the detonation waves, more numerous detonation fronts, and a faster mode transition. Conversely, reducing the total temperature maintains the number of detonation waves but results in increased wave intensity. An elevated vaporization rate of liquid droplets induces a quasi-isovolumetric combustion process within the detonation flow field, generating pressure shocks. The interaction between these pressure shocks and heat release contributes to the overall dynamics. Based on the self-sustaining energy growth characteristic of thermoacoustic instability, the system undergoes multiple cycles of decoupling and re-detonation, ultimately forming a stable detonation wave and leading to a transformation in the propagation mode.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.