Su-Wan CHOI, Min-Seon JO, Bu-Kyeng SUNG, Si-Yoon KANG, Jeong-Yeol CHOI

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-150

This study presents the design and experimental verification of a Circular-to-Obround Shape Transition (COST) nozzle, proposed as a candidate configuration for scramjet combustors. Conventional scramjets are generally based on either axisymmetric or rectangular cross-sections, each with distinct advantages and drawbacks. Axisymmetric geometries provide structural efficiency and stable pseudo-shock behavior, while rectangular geometries facilitate effective mixing, visualization, and injector placement
but suffer from stronger boundary-layer effects and higher total pressure losses. To combine these advantages, an obround cross-section, composed of semicircular arcs and flat walls, was introduced as a novel alternative. The COST nozzle was designed to simulate high-altitude flight conditions, with exit Mach number 2 and static pressure 3 bar at the isolator entrance. Boundary-layer corrections were incorporated using Sivell’s method. Experimental validation was performed by connecting the nozzle to the Vitiated Air Heater (VAH) facility at Pusan National University. Cold-flow wedge tests with high-speed Schlieren imaging confirmed uniform exit flow, with measured Mach numbers slightly above the
design value due to boundary-layer effects. The results demonstrate the feasibility of the COST nozzle and provide reference data for future investigations of obround scramjet isolator and combustor flow characteristics.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.