Salvatore ESPOSITO, Antonio SCHETTINO, Luigi CUTRONE, Domenic D’ AMBROSIO

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-244

Plasma formation in hypersonic reentry flows affects electromagnetic wave propagation, with direct implications for vehicle communications and radar signature. Accurate prediction of ionization is therefore essential to quantify these effects. This work presents a numerical analysis of electron density under the examined flight conditions of the RAM-C II vehicle using the in-house solver NExT, compared against CFD++ results and flight measurements. The simulations solve the compressible Navier–Stokes equa-
tions for a multicomponent, chemically reacting air mixture in thermal and chemical nonequilibrium, incorporating a multi-temperature model for vibrational energy. The influence of chemical kinetics, vibrational–chemical coupling, and surface catalyticity is systematically assessed. Among the tested kinetic schemes, Park’85 consistently overestimates electron concentrations, whereas Park’93 and Kim achieve closer agreement with experimental data. Surface boundary conditions also affect results, with a hybrid
approach—non-catalytic for neutral species and catalytic for charged species—producing the most consistent match with experimental data. Differences between NExT and CFD++ are most pronounced at the lowest and highest altitudes, whereas chemical kinetics and wall treatments affect electron density predictions across the examined flight conditions. The study provides a quantitative evaluation of modeling assumptions in hypersonic plasma simulations, supporting the application of NExT to reentry flow analyses where plasma–electromagnetic interactions are relevant.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.