Reece OTTO, Kyle DAMM, Rowan GOLLAN

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-259

The design of hypersonic airbreathing vehicles involves tightly coupled aerodynamics and propulsion, creating complex design spaces that are most effectively navigated using numerical optimisation techniques. However, achieving high-fidelity, many-parameter optimisation in three dimensions remains difficult while also maintaining efficiency and robustness. To address this challenge, this paper presents an adjoint-based aerodynamic shape optimisation (ASO) framework for three-dimensional hypersonic configurations. The framework integrates high-fidelity CFD analysis, adjoint-based sensitivity evaluation, and a two-level free-form deformation (FFD) parameterisation strategy. The method is demonstrated through the optimisation of a hypersonic lifting-body configuration subject to an internal payload constraint. The configuration was simulated using Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations and parameterised with 121 design variables. The optimisation required just over four days of runtime on a workstation and achieved a 21.8% improvement in lift-to-drag ratio. Geometric and flow field analyses revealed a reduced frontal area, a slenderised forebody, and waverider-like shock attachment
that improved aerodynamic efficiency and weakened side vortices. These results highlight the capability of adjoint-based methods to deliver efficient, high-fidelity optimisation of complex three-dimensional hypersonic vehicles, representing a step toward practical many-variable design studies in this regime.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.