Jie TIAN, Kunyuan ZHANG, Jinglei XU

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-357

Conventional balance force measurement systems are limited to measuring the overall loads and cannot decouple individual component contributions, which restricts the exploration of the flow mechanism behind aerodynamic loads. With the advancement of Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) technology, a PIV-based aerodynamic load measurement technique has been proposed, which indirectly measures aerodynamic loads by reconstructing multiple physical fields such as pressure and density. However, the performance of conventional pressure field reconstruction methods is severely reduced when applied to supersonic flow fields, which limits the extension of PIV-based aerodynamic load reconstruction method to supersonic nozzles. To address these challenges, this study proposes a supersonic pressure field reconstruction method for supersonic flow and a thrust performance reconstruction measurement for supersonic nozzle based on Flow Vector Splitting (FVS) technology. Through PIV experiments conducted in a direct-connect nozzle wind tunnel, we reconstructed multiphysics fields and aerodynamic performance parameters (including mass flow rate, thrust, and lift) under typical operating conditions. Evaluation results show that the reconstructed data calculated based on FVS method achieves higher accuracy and better self-consistency, satisfying conservation laws of mass flow and momentum. The relative errors of thrust and lift under over expansion conditions are merely -1.70% and 0.60%, respectively. The local errors in post-shock wall pressure remain below 3%. These results outperform conventional Poisson method and spatial integration method. Therefore, the experimental results have verified the feasibility and high accuracy of the PIV-based thrust performance reconstruction methodology for supersonic nozzles, which can provide valuable complementary data to conventional balance force easurement technology.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.