Fanglin Yu, Milán Barczi, Carlos Sebastia Saez, Béla Takarics, Yasser Meddaikar, Mirko Hornung

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-010

This study investigates the implementation of wing shape control using control surfaces to reduce drag and enhance aerodynamic performance. It evaluates several aerodynamic
modeling methods with focus on drag—namely, the Vortex Lattice Method, Doublet Lattice Method, and 3D Panel Method. Drag optimization was conducted on the D150 aircraft model, representative of short- to medium-range configurations, to determine the optimal control surface scheduling. The analysis included wings with aspect ratios of 9.7 and 11.2, exploring three distinct control surface layouts to ascertain the most effective control surface layout. The findings indicate that a drag reduction ranging from 1.5% to 2.5% is achievable on the wing with a nominal aspect ratio using 10 multifunctional control surfaces, underscoring the potential of wing shape control in improving aircraft efficiency.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.