Stefanie Düssler, Christoph Mertens, Rafael Palacios

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-028

The modelling capabilities of a nonlinear aeroelastic simulation toolbox regarding its gust response prediction of a very flexible wing are exercised against the wind tunnel
experiment of the Delft-Pazy wing. Sectional force corrections are employed to capture low Reynolds number effects and the static lift deficiency at high angles of attack due to the onset of separation. With these corrections, both the steady and dynamic wing deformations match the experimental results well. We further simulated the unsteady inflow to the Delft-Pazy wing that is produced by the gust vanes in the wind tunnel simultaneously with the wing itself, instead of using a frozen gust model. The results of this simulation indicate a considerable influence of the wing’s presence on the gust velocity that was measured upstream of the wing in the wind tunnel experiment. The structural response differs only slightly utilizing the two different gust models, confirming the frozen gust model being a valid assumption for the moderately large deflections of the Delft-Pazy wing. Possible geometrical nonlinear effects are assessed and are found to become apparent for this wing because of the nonlinear aeroelastic equlibrium but not the gust excitation itself.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.