Amir Hossein Modarres Aval, Vadim Maltsev, Zhuoneng Li, Declan Clifford, Andrea dr Da Ronch

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-061

The aerodynamic efficiency of an aircraft can be improved by adopting wings with a very high aspect ratio. However, the limitation to the wing size imposed by airport regulation and the increased structural weight required to support the extra aerodynamic loads produced by high aspect ratio wings need to be carefully addressed. To solve these issues, the concept of aircraft with semi-aeroelastic hinges which enables floating wingtips has been recently proposed and has attracted the attention of many researchers. However, this study provides new insights into this idea from the aspect of constraint loads at the hinges. In this work, using a multi-body dynamic simulation and a nonlinear quasi–steady aerodynamic model, an aircraft with articulated wings has been mathematically modelled, with the aircraft being composed of three rigid parts. This multi–body formulation enables one to account for finite rotations of rigid folding wing tips in addition to the traditional flight dynamic modes. Despite having a relatively small folded wing tip mass in the case study investigated here some changes have been observed in the flight dynamic behavior of the aircraft. A systematic study was carried out for different values of hinge flare angle and wingtip mass. It was found that the amount of forces and moments acting at the hinges is quite considerable and should be carefully accounted for during the preliminary design stage. In the presence of a side-slip angle, the asymmetric transient forces and moments at hinges can lead to larger deviation from the initial flight path.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.