Italo Cafarelli, Cedric Liauzun

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-067

Within the European Clean Sky 2 Airframe ITD/NACOR project, a 2D airfoil laminar model was designed, manufactured, highly instrumented and tested in the Onera S2MA transonic
wind tunnel in order to study the behaviour of the laminar-turbulent transition on the model under either steady angles of attack or forced dynamic pitch oscillations. The instrumentation included amongst others, static pressure taps, unsteady pressure sensors, accelerometers, optical displacement sensors and a high density hot films sensor array. The hot films were calibrated in order to get the time dependent wall shear stresses on the suction surface. Several key parameters were checked such as the inflow Mach number (from M=0.5 to M=0.77), the pitch angle (steady mean angle ranging from -3° to 3°, dynamic magnitude), the oscillation frequency and the Reynolds number. Steady and unsteady analysis pertaining to the influence of the different parameters are reported, including the pressure chordwise distributions with the inferred global loads and the transition locations. The comparisons between free laminar transition configurations and fully triggered turbulent flows are also given. Besides, several (U)RANS simulations performed with the Onera CFD code elsA using a transition model based on the AHD criteria and the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model are shown.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.