H. Climent, F. Arévalo, J.T. Viana, E. Pérez Heredia

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2019-103

Ditching is an emergency condition that ends with a planned “landing” of the aircraft on water. Four main phases may be considered in a ditching event: Approach, Impact, Landing and Floatation. This paper will address the loads aspects of the second phase, an extreme case of fluid-structure coupling where high pressures are developed during the impact of the sliding aircraft with water, which in turn may cause rupture of the structure, jeopardizing the required safe evacuation of crew and passengers. This problem is gathering significant attention from public and institutions especially after some recent events with large media coverage (like the ditching on the Hudson River, US Airways Flight 1549, 15 January 2009). Currently there are very few tools available to determine the loads generated during the ditching impact phase. This paper will present (and compare among them) ditching loads methodologies, one experimental and three different numerical simulation approaches: Experimentally measured ditching test results obtained in two European funded research projects: SMAES (Smart Aircraft in Emergency Situation, 2011-2014) and SARAH (Increased Safety and robust certification for ditching of aircrafts and helicopters, 2017-2019). Synthetic pressures derived analytically from SMAES experimental results. Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) technique embodied in an explicit FEM code Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). The main objective of the paper is to compare different alternatives, and decide which is currently the most suitable ditching loads methodology that could be used to simulate this event during aircraft design and certification. The ditching loads have to be obtained as function of the aircraft classical landing parameters (e.g. horizontal and vertical speed, pitch angle etc.) and should be applicable to any aircraft geometry. The paper concludes with the application of this methodology to a real case of a medium transport aircraft and suggestion for further research in this area.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: Dynamic Loads, IFASD 2019
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.