Philipp Bekemeyer, Reik Thormann, Sebastian Timme

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2019-068

Gust load alleviation has become an integral part of aircraft design to significantly decrease the impact of atmospheric turbulence on aircraft loads, handling qualities and also passenger comfort. During the design of an active control system, the aerodynamic response of the aircraft subjected to gust encounter and control surface deflection effects needs to be modelled. Current industrial practice is based on low-fidelity linear-potential panel methods which are repeatedly evaluated in frequency domain to obtain so-called frequency response functions. Even though rapid turnaround times are possible, important aerodynamic effects such as shock waves and resulting boundary layer separation which define transonic flow conditions are neglected. Typically, robust and adaptive control laws have been designed to account for the shortcomings of the underlying aerodynamic modelling fidelity. In contrast to this, we present initial results of a basic gust controller while using an enhanced aerodynamic modelling by solving the linearised Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations in frequency domain. Results are presented both for an aerofoil and a large aircraft configuration near transonic cruise conditions. Control laws derived from different levels of the aerodynamic hierarchy are scrutinised during unsteady simulations of realistic gust-encounter scenarios.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: Dynamic Loads, IFASD 2019
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.